|
| <prev next> |
Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Micros: msg#00150java.enhydra.xmlc
At 09:17 PM 9/30/2003 +0200, you wrote: The mockups have to be headerless since otherwise the CSS would be Why do you say this? Use Mozilla. The rest of it (IE and Opera) is crap anyway. Well, Opera is nice in other ways, but how they can be actively developing something that continues to have such glaring deficiencies is beyond me. I suppose that you would still want to test css out in IE and Opera. Your idea to let Ant strip this stuff away for testing should suffice. later, Jake
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity, Petr Stehlik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Migrating away from JSP, etc., David Corbin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity, Petr Stehlik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |