|
Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microso: msg#00149java.enhydra.xmlc
V Út, 30. 09. 2003 v 19:47, Jacob Kjome píše: > Hi Petr, Hi Jake, > Yeah, I guess I can agree with this for XHTML1.0 since XHTML1.0 documents > don't require the XML header. Great. > >function would disable generating this <?xml?> header.. > > Have you tried OutputOptions.setOmitXMLHeader(true)? No, I wrote my original mail without consulting any XMLC doc, sorry. > Yes, I hope it won't be too difficult as well, but I guess I'm less > concerned about the mockups being required to contain the XML header when > it is so easily stripped upon serialization using OutputOptions. If this > is a feature that you need very soon, I suggest digging into the compiler > and seeing if you can come up with a patch The mockups have to be headerless since otherwise the CSS would be ill-designed. But I won't be digging in the compiler. I'll rather add few commands to the XMLC ant task. Something like echo "<?xml...?>" > tmp.html cat file.html >> tmp.html xmlc tmp.html > won't be a priority for me since OutputOptions can already take care of this OK, sounds great. Thanks. Petr
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity, Jacob Kjome |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity, Jacob Kjome |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity, Jacob Kjome |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity, Jacob Kjome |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |