|
Re: to </p> or not to </p>: msg#00134java.enhydra.xmlc
On Monday 22 September 2003 13:45, Jacob Kjome wrote: > Hi everyone, > > So, does anyone have a problem with modifying XMLC to force <p> tags to be > ended with </p>? Obviously, either form is legal HTML4.01, but ending <p> > tags with </p> seems like the more correct thing to do and matches up with > the the next wave of HTML which is XHTML. People really should get used to > this at this point, but I'm asking for opinions here because I don't want > to break everyone's layouts unnecessarily. I'm all for encouraging people (and XMLC) to move more toward XHTML. I've been using it for a year, and while there have been some problems, I think it's the right thing to do. However, I don't think the way to do that is to break what seems to work right now in HTML. -- David Corbin <dcorbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: to </p> or not to </p>, Jacob Kjome |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: to </p> or not to </p>, Mark Diekhans |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: to </p> or not to </p>, Matthew Hixson |
| Next by Thread: | XMLC used at schools :), PMERGAER |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |