logo       

to </p> or not to </p>: msg#00130

java.enhydra.xmlc

Subject: to </p> or not to </p>


Hi everyone,

I'm wondering what peoples' thoughts are about DOM serialization and dealing with <p> elements. Currently, XMLC treats the <p> tag specially, classifying it as a tag that shouldn't have an end tag written for it.. This seems to have been an arbitrary preference of early developers of XMLC. I, for one, do not agree with it, although I have an idea why it was done. Some early browsers rendered <p></p> differently than <p>. As such, it became common for HTML developers to exclude the </p> in their markup. Then again, some developers standardized on the more XHTML-like <p></p> and printing out <p> messes up their formatting. With today's smarter browsers, all of this should be moot.

So, does anyone have a problem with modifying XMLC to force <p> tags to be ended with </p>? Obviously, either form is legal HTML4.01, but ending <p> tags with </p> seems like the more correct thing to do and matches up with the the next wave of HTML which is XHTML. People really should get used to this at this point, but I'm asking for opinions here because I don't want to break everyone's layouts unnecessarily.

Jake


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise