Sounds reasonable to me. If there aren't objections from other XMLC
developers today, then I'll make the change. Is the name xmlcxml.jar
acceptable to everyone? Any other suggestions?
BTW, you should be including one or the other of xmlParserAPIs.jar and
xml-apis.jar, not both. They perform the same function. I have been told
on the xerces-j-user list that xml-apis.jar is the preferred jar name. The
xmlParserAPIs.jar is still generated only to satisfy people that have been
using that jar name. Seems to me like they should just pick one or the
other to avoid confusion, but... So, I'd suggest including xercesImpl.jar
and xml-apis.jar from Xerces2 in Enhydra5.1.
Jake
At 12:18 PM 7/9/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
In Enhydra5.1 final we will include xmlc 2.2 and Xerces 2.4, and we will
have
all necessary jars in Enhydra5.1\lib directory.
We don't want to use xmlc-all-runtime.jar because we need many separate
jar-files to be very modular. Problem is with xerces.jar which came with
XMLC 2.2.
We think that it will be a little confusing for developers to have this
names of jars:
xerces.jar (which is modified Xerces 1.4.4 sources produced by xmlc with
different packages)
XercesImp.jar, xmlParserApis.jar and xml-apis.jar from Xerces 2.
We renamed xerces.jar in xmlcxml.jar (suggestion by Alfred Madl), and our
question is: could you rename this jar file into something different than
xerces.jar, because we want to include XMLC 2.2 in Enhydra without any
changes.
Dragan Radakovic
Together, Serbia
_______________________________________________
XMLC mailing list
XMLC@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xmlc
| 