|
Re: output html as lower case?: msg#00014java.enhydra.xmlc
At 04:55 PM 6/24/2003 +0200, you wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2003 16:33, Jacob Kjome wrote: That's what I figured :-( > If only the latter, then the change is probably not worth the effort, Actually, if we could implement html dom level2 which just became a recommendation, then we could do this and also get rid XMLC's XHTML-specific stuff since with html dom level2... http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/ http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/java-binding.html Actually, now that I look at it, it may be that one would have to specify the implementation as "XML" rather than "HTML" to get this behavior. See: http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/changes.html <quote> The DOM Level 2 HTML module supports HTML 4 as well as XHTML 1.0 documents. Therefore, case sensitivity in methods depends on Document support for the feature "XML" as well as "HTML". <quote> Anyway, I know that Xerces2 does not yet have an dom level2 html implementation as of yet. Maybe we can write it and contribute it to the Xerces2 project? Or just let them write it, if they already have plans to do so. In the mean time, I'll investigate Mark's comment where he mentioned that maybe XPath should be case-insensitive in relation to the HTML DOM. That would solve the issue in a way that isn't dependent on us storing the HTML DOM in a way that might break the specification. Jake --
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Using XMLC with XML, Alberto Quario |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: output html as lower case?, Mark Diekhans |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: output html as lower case?, Mark Diekhans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: output html as lower case?, Mark Diekhans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |