Re: going through old patches...are these still relevant?

A small update on this....

I've just committed patch #4 (with a few modifications) below. 
Probably should look at patches 1 - 3 for XMLC-2.2 and the bug report
that actually does have a patch workaround, but it is, apparently, not
ideal and needs thought.

Any other stuff that should be on the TODO list for an XMLC-2.2 full
release?

Jake

At 01:30 PM 5/21/2003 -0500, you wrote:

> I'm just looking back through the
> archives at some patches I found that don't seem be included in
> XMLC.  I'd like to know if there was a reason or if they were just
> lost in the shuffle...
>
> 1.  Patch to provide support for isSupported()  - from James
> Graves
> http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01391.html
>
> 2.  SSI Basedir option - from Diez B. Roggisch
> http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01393.html
>
> 3.  patch for using getElementByID() on a WML and XHTML document DOM
> - from James Graves
> http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01632.html
>
> 4.  patch for supporting more dtds and new structure for storing
> dtd's locally - from James Graves
> http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01641.html
>
> Richard actually seemed to accept this on in a follow-up message he sent,
> but the patch was never applied.
> http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01696.html
>
>
> Not patches, but might want to look into these...
>
> 1.  a test case pointing out a bug is provided.  Not sure if
> the bug has been addressed yet.
> http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01749.html
>
> 2.  diff between XMLC's xerces and the official Xerces-1.4.4 - from
> Denny Chambers
> http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/xmlc/msg01768.html
>
> If we got Xerces2 to incorporate relevant patches, that would make moving
> to Xerces2 much easier.
>
>
>
> I'm sure there is other stuff, but I wanted to get this recorded in one
> spot so we can easily reference what might need to be done.
>
> Jake