At 10:28 PM 4/10/2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Èt, 2003-04-10 at 22:05, Jacob
Kjome wrote:
> fathom why you'd bother putting an id attribute
you must have missed the fact that it's not me who creates the HTML.
The
ID was already there and the HTML guy argued that XMLC is crappy when
it
can't compile a perfectly valid XHTML document.
Ok, fair enough. It was someone else being redundant.
> redundant and as
bugs go, I'd put this one at the bottom of the list
> to fix.
The "fix" is to update the DTD to the latest revision (i.e. to
update
one file that was downloaded from w3.org and included in the XMLC
without any change). Enhydra 5.1 already contains that. I mentioned
it
in the list of 6 items just to be complete (to list all issues I
encountered).
Well, that makes sense. If XMLC doesn't have the latest DTD, then
it should have it. BTW, how does one switch between DTDs?
Does XMLC read the source file's DTD and compile against that? I
assume that it uses the local version that matches the declared one in
the template instead of downloading it. What if the version being
compiled against is XHTML1.1? Those dtd's don't currently exist in
the CVS source. Only the 1.0 dtd's exist. Should they be
added?
Jake
Petr
_______________________________________________
XMLC mailing list
XMLC@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xmlc
| 