Re: still too early for XHTML :-((

At 07:26 PM 4/10/2003 +0200, you wrote:
> Again. I got the files and couldn't
> compile them. The validator said the
> files were OK. The compiler was not in sync with the validator, it
> had
> outdated DTD. In later revisions of XHTML 1.0 they extended the DTD
> -
> every tag can have an ID. What can't you understand? I know that the
> ID
> is not needed in the TITLE tag but I still think that XMLC should
> follow
> the latest XHTML revisions. 

I think you know perfectly well what I can't understand because you
hinted at it when you said "I know the ID is not needed". 
I can't fathom why you'd bother putting an id attribute, whose sole
purpose is life is to distinguish an element from others, on a
<title> element when the spec says that there must be no more and
no less than *one* <title> element in an HTML or XHTML
document.  It is already unique.  Do you wish to make it doubly
unique (does that even mean anything?)?  That said, I agree with you
that there is no reason XMLC's XHTML parser shouldn't allow it.  It
is just completely redundant and as bugs go, I'd put this one at the
bottom of the list to fix.

Jake