Re: Xmlc: still too early for XHTML :-((

On Po, 2003-04-07 at 18:20, dcorbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> We've been using XHTML+XMLC for 9 months, and we too encountered that
> problem.  My solution, was to do it this way:
> <script src="x"><!-- IE Sucks --></script>

Yes, I also got the same idea. It even works. But I don't believe it
anymore - I wonder how many similar problems may appear later, closer to
the deadline...

> Having said that, I'm also curious as to what the document type you're
> sending down in your request headers.  Even though we produce XHTML, we're
> really telling it we are an html document.

Yeah, I am also sending "text/html". I tried other but then JavaScript
didn't see DOM at all - I also posted about this back in January.

I even submitted a patch to Enhydra maintainers so Enhydra 5.1 will
produce proper (=compatible) document type.

Petr