logo       

Re: xmlc 2.2 alpha 4: msg#00066

java.enhydra.xmlc

Subject: Re: xmlc 2.2 alpha 4


On Thursday, Mar 20, 2003, at 02:50 Asia/Shanghai, Chris Webb wrote:

Yeah I got the latest from ObjectWeb. A few points:

1. I think Ant should also be put in xmlc/xmlc/modules/xmlc/lib because of the XMLC taskdef Ant dependacy. I realise that Ant is required globally but I think it's a better approach not to deliver Ant for the purpose of building everything as people generally have Ant installed on their development envionment for that purpose. Also adding a particular version of Ant to XMLC lib allows us to add some guarantee that the XMLC taskdef will work with the right version of Ant. Does that make any sense?

Actually, I think Ant should not be included at all. Unfortunately, the build.xml we have right now have an dependency on 1.4 and a lot of people are using 1.5. The ant is included for the purpose.

2. It would be great to have an Ant taskdef that creates the HTML LazyDOMs as I don't build under Linux/Unix.

Yes, I agree. Any one know a good ant task that would do string substitution?

David


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise