Pretty much every thing in org.apache will be moved to org.enhydra.xmlc.xerces and the org.apache.wml package will be removed. This is same as the WML package already in the XMLC.
David Li
On Tuesday, Jan 28, 2003, at 00:09 Asia/Shanghai, Christian Cryder wrote:
Having come to this conversation late, can someone summarize which packages we're thinking about renaming, just so we can make sure that doesn't cause any grief for Barracuda? Conversely, I can post a list of XMLC/Xerces package names that Barracuda uses, if that would be more helpful, but I won't be able to get to it until this afternoon...
THanks...
Christian
----------------------------------------------
Christian Cryder [christianc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Internet Architect, ATMReports.com
Barracuda - http://barracudamvc.org
----------------------------------------------
"Coffee? I could quit anytime, just not today"
-----Original Message-----
From: xmlc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xmlc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jacob Kjome
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:47 AM
To: xmlc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Xmlc: Moving XMLC to ObjectWeb's SF
I have no problem with the move. Sounds like a good idea. However, I'm wondering if we shouldn't make a release of XMLC in its current state before doing the package renaming? That is, unless it really isn't a big deal to do. I'm just worried that there might be some bugs to flush out if the changes are significant. The new reloading is compelling enough to want it sooner than later. The current state could be released as XMLC-2.2 and the next package-renamed release could be XMLC-3.0 which would distinguish it from the 2.x releases. An XMLC refactored to use DOM4J might be released as XMLC-4.0 to distinguish it from the Xerces releases. Sound logical?
BTW, does the package renaming include gnu-regexp and jtidy? I'd think that would be unnecessary. Xerces is the source of all the problems. The other libraries can be left alone until such time as they are deemed to be problematic as well.
Jake
At 01:17 PM 1/27/2003 +0100, you wrote:
On Sunday 26 January 2003 08:46, David Li wrote:
> I have registered a Enhydra XMLC project on ObjectWeb's SF
> (http://debian-sf.objectweb.org/) and plan to move XMLC over. Since
> this is going to begin a new CVS tree, should we perform the refatoring
> of the Xerces namespace before moving?
+1 from me. If the CVS tree is moved anyway, we can do the package rename at
the same time, without losing the version history.
--
Richard Kunze
[ t]ivano Software, Bahnhofstr. 18, 63263 Neu-Isenburg
Tel.: +49 6102 80 99 07 - 0, Fax.: +49 6102 80 99 07 - 1
http://www.tivano.de, kunze@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
XMLC mailing list
XMLC@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xmlc
|
| 
