|
Re: XMLC and Xerces 2: msg#00040java.enhydra.xmlc
David Corbin <dcorbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'd certainly like to see this. Mostly to get away from patched > versions of "standard" libraries. The patches to xerces are big black > eye that shows up everytime I have to defend XMLC against JSP.... This requires someone going though the patches and determining which are still bugs in xerces, migrating those that are to the current xerces and submitting them to the xerces folks. Many are to the HTML DOM, which I don't think has change much. One isn't really a xerces bug, but something that should be changed in XMLC. All of the patches are documented. None of this is really all that hard, just time consuming. If anyone wants to take this on, I will be happy to advise. I wish I had the time to actually do it, but I don't, and will not in the foreseeable future. But this is really the only way it's going to happen. Mark
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: XMLC and Xerces 2, David Corbin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XMLC performance tuning, please help, Jacob Kjome |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XMLC and Xerces 2, David Corbin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XMLC and Xerces 2, Mark Diekhans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |