Re: Thought on future of XMLC

On Thursday 21 November 2002 12:04, Chris Webb wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I agree with you on this. This change would be a completely different
> beast to the current XMLC. If we lose the convenience methods then we
> would lose the ability to create interfaces to abstract the dynamic
> requirements of each document and thus compile time checking of dynamic
> content compliancy. We use these dynamic content interfaces extensively
> for multiple look and feels for HTML, WML and VoiceXML.

Same here, I use the conevenience methods quite often, and for much the same 
reasons. But I definitely see that there are cases where they are not needed.

I'd like to support both in XMLC, and I think the best way to do this is to 
make the code generation process easier to change - probably by making it 
template driven. 

What do you think?

Richard
-- 
Richard Kunze 

[ t]ivano Software, Bahnhofstr. 18, 63263 Neu-Isenburg
Tel.: +49 6102 80 99 07 - 0, Fax.: +49 6102 80 99 07 - 1
http://www.tivano.de, kunze@xxxxxxxxx