|
Re: Re[2]: Thought on future of XMLC: msg#00065java.enhydra.xmlc
Hi Merg, This completely depends on the document and how it accessed. For documents that have a fair amount of non-dynamic content, it can be a big win, I observed 5x speedup in some test documents taken from real applications. On the other hand, a highly dynamic document may go signficantly slower. Your pretty much have to experiment. There are some routines to log statistics about the state of a lazydom at write time, which can be helpful in analyzing behavior. Mark Merg <merg@xxxxxxx> writes: > Is there really that big of performance hit when using Xerces in stead > of LazyDOm? Most of the time we create very large and very dynamic > pages, and we couldn't really notice the difference.
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | twice the number of rows i expected, Michael Muller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Thought on future of XMLC, Mark Diekhans |
| Previous by Thread: | Re[2]: Thought on future of XMLC, Merg |
| Next by Thread: | Re[2]: Thought on future of XMLC, Jacob Kjome |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |