|
Re[2]: Thought on future of XMLC: msg#00063java.enhydra.xmlc
Hello David, DL> This leads to another question. How many people are depending on HTML DL> DOM (and for that matter, WML, cHTML or XHTML DOM) in their code? DL> Neither DOM4J or JDOM support these document specific DOM. DL> David I have to believe that most people using XMLC are depending, at least, upon the HTML DOM. That shouldn't be a problem to continue to support, should it? Otherwise, what is the alternative? We would have an XML document that would have to be transformed into XHTML via an XSLT stylesheet. That could be made relatively fast if the stylesheet was pre-compiled, but the whole point about XMLC is that your mockups are your XMLC pages. This makes development easy. That said, using straight compiled XML and modifying that would make the document less presentation bound since multiple XSLT documents could define multiple different views of the same data. In addition, it would still be easy to display the mockups since Both IE5+ and Mozilla contain XSL Transformers which can be run directly from the browser. What are your thoughts on this? Jake -- Best regards, Jacob mailto:hoju@xxxxxxxx
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re[4]: Thought on future of XMLC, Jacob Kjome |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | twice the number of rows i expected, Michael Muller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Thought on future of XMLC, David Li |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: Thought on future of XMLC, David Li |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |