logo       

Re: Re: Enhydra: Re: Enhydra: tomcat vs. enhydra: msg#00062

java.enhydra.general

Subject: Re: Re: Enhydra: Re: Enhydra: tomcat vs. enhydra

Are you using XMLC 2.2? It's pretty straight forward to use XMLC 2.2
with Tomcat. In fact, Tomcat is used as the development environment of
XMLC 2.2. ;) There is an example in 2.2 distribution.

No, i'm stuck with the xmlc that comes with enhydra (now 5.1beta7), i've
looked at 2.2alpha4 but never tried it in a production stage probably
cause i was scared by the 'alpha' stage.
As i can read the only thing changed is the xerces now packaged
differently... right ?

I definitely need to drop the Alpha at some point and release the beta soon. People are scared of the "alpha" tag. :)

We have been using 2.2 in production for three months now. It's very stable.

More XMLC 2.2 promotion here:

http://debian-sf.objectweb.org/projects/xmlc

Definitely i'll look at it more deeper... I think there's no problem
replacing xmlc jars within 5.1beta7 with the ones from xmlc2.2alpha4, am
i wrong ? Are you aware of problems with this configuration ?

I haven't try it. There are name space rearrangement for the Xerces. I have been trying to find time to test Enhydra in CVS and XMLC 2.2. Will let you know when I get around to do it.

David


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise