|
Re: tomcat vs. enhydra: msg#00055java.enhydra.general
Before Servlet 2.2, Enhydra has Filter that can be attached to URL request. But this feature is now in the Servlet 2.3. Filter in Enhydra (under supersevlet setting) still has more features but the extra isn't much. Session Manager. Enhydra still has better session manager then Tomcat. However, I think Tomcat supports a plug-in architecture for session and it's possible to port Enhydra's session manager to Tomcat. It's probably easy to take the view point of Enhydra SuperServlet as a Framework the Enhydra as app server. In this view, Enhydra and Tomcat should be complement instead of competing. Asking Enhydra vs Tomcat is kind of like asking Struts vs Tomcat. The other tools for Enhydra, namely XMLC, DODS and others are OK to be used on top of Tomcat. I think the Enhydra 6.0 is heading the direction of making Enhydra a framework. David On Wednesday, Apr 23, 2003, at 06:19 Asia/Shanghai, David H. Young wrote: That's exactly it... I'm asking the question "why would one go with enhydra and not tomcat?"
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: tomcat vs. enhydra, Terry Steichen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: tomcat vs. enhydra, Barr Bill P |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tomcat vs. enhydra, Terry Steichen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tomcat vs. enhydra, Lok Yek Soon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |