RE: Moving forward with Enhydra

Do you have an example conf file for doing that?

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: enhydra-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:enhydra-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Keith McClelland
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:32 PM
To: enhydra@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Enhydra: Moving forward with Enhydra


Hello.

We currently deploy Enhydra 3.1 alongside Apache 2.  Apache serves up 
the static content and the rest is passed to Enhydra instances via the 
ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse directives.   This might help, depending 
on how you plan to use Director.

-Keith

Matt Howell wrote:

> Is there a public repository where the active development files for
> Enhydra are available?  It looks like both the ObjectWeb repository
> (empty) and the original repository (antiquated) are not currently
> active with the soon to be Enhydra 5.1.
>
> Also, perhaps this is better suited for the Director mailing list
> (afraid to post because it has been several months without activity),
> but is anyone actually deploying Enhydra alongside of Apache 2 yet?
>
> Has anyone begun the conversion of the Director shared object to the new
> module paradigm? 
>
> If not, would it be possible to use one of the connectors available with
> other Application Servers?  (Tomcat / Coyote)
>
> -Matt Howell
> mhowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Enhydra mailing list
> Enhydra@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/enhydra
>

_______________________________________________
Enhydra mailing list
Enhydra@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/enhydra