|
postHook behavior change in 2.0 RC2?: msg#00149java.dwr.user
I recently updated my DWR library from 2.0 RC1 (2.0M4b) to 2.0 RC2 and have noticed a difference in the behavior of the DWREngine.endBatch, postHook behavior. Below is some sample code w/output that demonstrates the difference. DWREngine.beginBatch(); myDwrService.methodA( param1, function() { alert(‘methodA – completed’); } ); myDwrService.methodB( param1, function() { alert(‘methodB – completed’); } ); DWREngine.endBatch( async:true; preHook: function() { alert(‘preHook – invoked’); } postHook: function() { alert(‘postHook – invoked’); } ); 2.0 RC1 (2.0M4b) Output: preHook – invoked methodA – completed methodB – completed postHook – invoked 2.0 RC2 Output: preHook – invoked postHook – invoked methodA – completed methodB – completed The difference here is that postHook handler in RC2 is invoked after all calls within the batch have been *remoted* where as in RC1 the postHook was invoked after all calls *responded*. This difference is causing me some grief. Is there a way in RC2 to determine when all calls within a batch have completed (i.e. responded)? I have subsequent processing that must take place after all calls in the batch have responded to the client. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/postHook-behavior-change-in-2.0-RC2--tf3241170.html#a9009990 Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: DWR returning complex data types?, oblongman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Safari and DWR 2 (rc2), Dan Hardiker |
| Previous by Thread: | DWR returning complex data types?, oblongman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: postHook behavior change in 2.0 RC2?, Mike Wilson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |