logo       

Re: Contributing to standard checks: msg#00278

Subject: Re: Contributing to standard checks
> Then again I am not a lawyer. Do the Google lawyers expect something to be
> physically signed? If so, I am happy for a signed document to be sent to me.

Yes. They're asking for a document to sign. Let me see if they have
something canned.

--steve

>
> Cheers,
> Oliver
>
>
>  On 10/31/07, Steve McKay☄ <smckay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> > Can you point me to your copyright assignment agreement?
> >
> > --steve
> >
> > On Oct 16, 2007 2:27 PM, Steve McKay☄ <smckay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi Oliver,
> > >
> > > > Yes, copyright assignment is required to be assigned to me
> > >
> > > Okay. Do you have a copyright assignment agreement that needs to be
> signed?
> > >
> > > --steve
> > >
> > >
> > > > I can help out here. Yes, copyright assignment is required to be
> assigned to
> > > > me. This goes way back to when I wanted to change the licensing from
> GPL to
> > > > LGPL. To do this properly was difficult due to the copyright issue.
> Luckily
> > > > at the time the project was small and it could be worked around. I
> also had
> > > > issues when I wanted to change the license of Chainsaw to contribute
> to the
> > > > Log4J project, when one of the contributors would not change the
> license for
> > > > their code.
> > > >
> > > > From that point on I have required that copyright assignment is
> required to
> > > > be assigned to me. Imagine in the future it becomes advantageous to
> move to
> > > > the GP{Lv3 license, then this move is possible because of the
> copyright
> > > > assignment. Without it, I would never even consider it.
> > > >
> > > > I hope this helps.
> > > >
> > > > Regards.
> > > > Oliver
> > > >
> > > > On 9/19/07, Steve McKay☄ < smckay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Lars,
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks like the checks for the checkstyle project as configured in
> > > > > checkstyle_checks.xml require copy right assignment via the Header
> > > > > check on line 39, but the "Contributing" page
> > > > >
> (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/contributing.html)
> > > > doesn't mention
> > > > > this. Can you help me understand if a copyright assignment is
> required
> > > > > as part of a code contribution?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > --steve
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/12/07, Steve McKay☄ <smckay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Lars,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds interesting. While I don't see why you would want to
> allow
> > > > > > > silly names in new code I can see the value of this feature in
> code
> > > > > > > cleanup efforts for existing code, where you would tackle the
> public
> > > > > > > API of a module first. Is that the intended use case?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think our need emerged from the now abandoned practice of
> prefixing
> > > > > > (or was it suffixing) private members with underscores.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, please submit three individual patches and make sure that
> they
> > > > > > > follow the guidelines in our "contributing" document.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Excellent. I'll get them to you soon. Thanks for the feedback.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Steve McKay < smckay@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Steve McKay <smckay@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > > >
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Checkstyle-devel mailing list
> > > > > Checkstyle-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-devel
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > >
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Checkstyle-devel mailing list
> > > > Checkstyle-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Steve McKay <smckay@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steve McKay < smckay@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Checkstyle-devel mailing list
> > Checkstyle-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-devel
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Checkstyle-devel mailing list
> Checkstyle-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-devel
>
>


-- 
Steve McKay <smckay@xxxxxxxxxx>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Checkstyle-devel mailing list
Checkstyle-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>