logo       

Re: Contributing to standard checks: msg#00265

Subject: Re: Contributing to standard checks
Hi Lars,

> Sounds interesting. While I don't see why you would want to allow
> silly names in new code I can see the value of this feature in code
> cleanup efforts for existing code, where you would tackle the public
> API of a module first. Is that the intended use case?

I think our need emerged from the now abandoned practice of prefixing
(or was it suffixing) private members with underscores.

> Yes, please submit three individual patches and make sure that they
> follow the guidelines in our "contributing" document.

Excellent. I'll get them to you soon. Thanks for the feedback.

-- 
Steve McKay <smckay@xxxxxxxxxx>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>