|
Re: security audit: msg#00175jakarta.velocity.user
Actually, I have already went through the Java API and identified those methods that shouldn't be allowed to be called from a template. The list is used in FreeMarker to restrict calls to methods at its default security level (FreeMarker actually has security levels for accessing methods...) You can find the list at (watch for line breaks), hope you can have some use of it. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/freemarker/freemar ker/src/freemarker/ext/beans/unsafeMethods.txt?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/pl ain I think the methods in this list are quite reasonable to prevent from being called from a template. Naturally, that's only part of the solution. If you want to prevent the code inside the called method to perform System.exit() etc., you have to resort to the Java security system. Filtering unsafe methods only helps protect against direct calls to unsafe methods when you can't otherwise affect the security policy, but is far from complete security. Again, that's about as much safety as you can guarantee from the template engine level. Additional security against unsafe calls deeper in the call graph has to come from properly set up and enforced Java security policy. Attila. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: security audit: 00175, Jonathan Revusky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: security audit: 00175, Attila Szegedi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: security auditi: 00175, Jonathan Revusky |
| Next by Thread: | Re: security audit: 00175, Andy Lee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |