|
Antwort: Missing type for TIMESTAMP in jdbc task.: msg#00088jakarta.turbine.torque.user
Hi, There was a discussion one or two mothths ago about this in the mailing list. Please search the archives. Personally, I am using the "date" type with oracle 9i. It has only a limited accuracy, but it works. Thomas Krishna C Tripathi <kct2004@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 16.11.2004 01:07:10: > Hi, > When generating schema from existing tables for oracle it is not > mapping TIMESTAMP type to any type is schema.xml. Basically it make > type="" in schema.xml. Has anyone else faced the same? Please advise me. > > Regards, > Krishna > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Using torque-gen from a java program: 00088, Thomas Fischer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Antwort: Re: Subtracting fields in the Where Clause: 00088, arne . siegel |
| Previous by Thread: | Missing type for TIMESTAMP in jdbc task.i: 00088, Krishna C Tripathi |
| Next by Thread: | Reserved words in db's: 00088, Pedro Castro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |