logo       

Future Torque build system (was: Re: Torque 4.0 plan): msg#00057

jakarta.turbine.torque.devel

Subject: Future Torque build system (was: Re: Torque 4.0 plan)

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:

Thomas Vandahl <thomas.vandahl@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Another piece of advice that I learned from a project that I'm
involved with: Don't. Decide on *one* build, embrace it wholeheartedly
and ditch everything else. Else you will get "project built with foo"
jars, "project built with bar" jars and "project built with baz"
jars. Each behaves a bit differently. Maintenance nightmare. Don't go
there. :-)


At least we should have one "main build", and use the other build only to build the respective plugin. I'm quite sure it is a nightmare to build a maven2 plugin with maven 1; I'd expect it less nightmare to build a maven1 plugin using maven2, but I'm not sure if it is worse or better than maintaining an extra build.

Thomas


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise