Download Firefox: WindowsMac OS X
logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

RE: MaxObjects not meaningful?: msg#00125

Subject: RE: MaxObjects not meaningful?
No, I'm not. I didn't think it was a requirement... just a convience for
people who did.

What about the upgrade path for these jars? How is that handled, seeing as
how 2.x is no longer widely available?

-Travis Savo <tsavo@xxxxxxxxx>

-----Original Message-----
From: James Taylor [mailto:james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 4:49 AM
To: Turbine JCS Developers List
Subject: Re: MaxObjects not meaningful?


> How do we deal with situations like this? Possible solutions I'm 
> looking for
> are: Tell me to commit the upgrade to v3.0 (perhaps in a branch?), OR 
> clue
> me into the location of the v2.x jisp.jar.

http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/jisp/jars/

You are using maven right?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-jcs-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-jcs-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>