|
Re: staged deployment: msg#00151jakarta.avalon.phoenix.devel
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 08:41 PM, Mike Salisbury wrote: I've got a problem with the bootstrapping sequence How are you currently utilizing block dependencies and the Initializable interface? I would do two things: 1) Make each block implement Initializable and perform all init in there. Don't exit the method until you are initialized. 2) Make each upper-layer block have a dependency upon lower-layer blocks that it needs. This can be stacked. So 1 depends on 2 which depends on 3. You don't need a direct dependency between 1 and 3. If this is all old-hat and you're already doing it, I apologize. Otherwise, does it make sense? Is it similar to how you are currently implementing things? -pete -- peter royal -> proyal@xxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | staged deployment: 00151, Mike Salisbury |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XDoclet Tags: 00151, Daniel Krieg |
| Previous by Thread: | staged deploymenti: 00151, Mike Salisbury |
| Next by Thread: | Re: staged deployment: 00151, Paul Hammant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |