|
[jira] Updated: (JXPATH-133) Cloning the node pointers and '==' node pointe: msg#00340issues-commons-apache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Orlov updated JXPATH-133: ---------------------------------- Description: During the implementation of JCR nodes support in JXPath (extending NodePonter's, NodeIterator's, NodePointerFactory ) I faced with the following situation: I was running a xpath query against the context (JXPathContext instance) like: context.iteratePointers("/child::* | @ * ") After that I got an exception JXPathException: "Cannot compare pointers that do not belong to the same tree: '/home' and '/home' " thrown from NodePointer.compareNodePointers(...) method. After debugging this case I've found that for the node pointers extracted via the "/child::*|@*" xpath expression NodePointer.compareTo(Object) was invoked (and consequently NodePointer.compareNodePointers(...) ). In fact all node pointers matching the "/child::*|@*" xpath expression had the same node pointer (I checked it against my implementations of NodePointerFactory, NodeIterator's etc.). But as I found for these node pointers they were initialized with different clones of the same parent node pointer. And the result was that in NodePointer.compareTo(Object) method the following "==" comparison evaluated in false for the different clones of the same parent node pointer: if (parent == pointer.parent) { return parent == null ? 0 : parent.compareChildNodePointers(this, pointer); } As the workaround for this case I overrode the clone method for my NodePointer descendants to return 'this'. I think there is some misbalance made between the usage of clone () method of NodePointer's and "==" comparison of NodePointers. was: During the implementation of JCR nodes support in JXPath (extending NodePonter's, NodeIterator's, NodePointerFactory ) I faced with the following situation: I was running a xpath query against the context (JXPathContext instance) like: context.iteratePointers("/child::*|@*") After that I got an exception JXPathException: "Cannot compare pointers that do not belong to the same tree: '/home' and '/home' " thrown from NodePointer.compareNodePointers(...) method. After debugging this case I've found that for the node pointers extracted via the "/child::*|@*" xpath expression NodePointer.compareTo(Object) was invoked (and consequently NodePointer.compareNodePointers(...) ). In fact all node pointers matching the "/child::*|@*" xpath expression had the same node pointer (I checked it against my implementations of NodePointerFactory, NodeIterator's etc.). But as I found for these node pointers they were initialized with different clones of the same parent node pointer. And the result was that in NodePointer.compareTo(Object) method the following "==" comparison evaluated in false for the different clones of the same parent node pointer: if (parent == pointer.parent) { return parent == null ? 0 : parent.compareChildNodePointers(this, pointer); } As the workaround for this case I overrode the clone method for my NodePointer descendants to return 'this'. I think there is some misbalance made between the usage of clone () method of NodePointer's and "==" comparison of NodePointers. > Cloning the node pointers and '==' node pointers comparison > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JXPATH-133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-133 > Project: Commons JXPath > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Environment: JDK 1.5.0_12, JBoss 4.0.5 > Reporter: Vladimir Orlov > > During the implementation of JCR nodes support in JXPath (extending > NodePonter's, NodeIterator's, NodePointerFactory ) I faced with the following > situation: I was running a xpath query against the context (JXPathContext > instance) like: > context.iteratePointers("/child::* | @ * ") > After that I got an exception JXPathException: "Cannot compare pointers that > do not belong to the same tree: '/home' and '/home' " thrown from > NodePointer.compareNodePointers(...) method. After debugging this case I've > found that for the node pointers extracted via the "/child::*|@*" xpath > expression NodePointer.compareTo(Object) was invoked (and consequently > NodePointer.compareNodePointers(...) ). In fact all node pointers matching > the "/child::*|@*" xpath expression had the same node pointer (I checked it > against my implementations of NodePointerFactory, NodeIterator's etc.). But > as I found for these node pointers they were initialized with different > clones of the same parent node pointer. And the result was that in > NodePointer.compareTo(Object) method the following "==" comparison evaluated > in false for the different clones of the same parent node pointer: > if (parent == pointer.parent) { > return parent == null ? 0 : parent.compareChildNodePointers(this, > pointer); > } > As the workaround for this case I overrode the clone method for my > NodePointer descendants to return 'this'. I think there is some misbalance > made between the usage of clone () method of NodePointer's and "==" > comparison of NodePointers. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise |