On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 15:32 +0100, Arne Redlich wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2006, 09:13 -0500 schrieb Ming Zhang:
> > On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 09:40 +0100, Arne Redlich wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2006, 08:48 -0500 schrieb Ming Zhang:
> > > > it looks like the patch i have before. so it will not be accepted.
> > > >
> > > > please check email archive and find out why my patch is not merged yet.
> > > > the reason is parameter parsing, but i do not know exactly why (if i
> > > > know, i will fix it and get it merged long time ago).
> > > >
> > > > the only people here who decide whether one patch is merged or not is
> > > > Tomof. Arne and I are code contributor and technical support man.
> > > >
> > > > Ming
> > > >
> > >
> > > Apart from that, it still won't work with nullio. ;-)
> >
> > really? i never try ro on nullio. :P
>
> I have neither (nor do I have a particular need for it), but judging
> from the code, it won't work. A clean solution is more likely getting
> merged. ;-)
yes, same as me, for nullio, i test performance and never do ro.
>
> Arne
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
|
