logo       

Re: ReadOnly patch for 0.4.12 and 0.4.13: msg#00122

Subject: Re: ReadOnly patch for 0.4.12 and 0.4.13
Hi.

I'm writing ReadOnly support for iet and I found out that Ming's similar
patch was rejected in the past, but I don't know why. Ming and I
couldn't find it in the archive. Can you say what was the reason?

----- Forwarded message from Ming Zhang <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx> -----

Subject: Re: [Iscsitarget-devel] ReadOnly patch for 0.4.12 and 0.4.13
From: Ming Zhang <mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: mingz@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: Damian Pietras <daper@xxxxxxxxx>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 131.128.51.63

i could not find as well. :P

it is not that read only session discussion.

maybe u can send an email to Tomof and ask why. i remembered at that
time, he ask me to find out by myself. i think this feature is not
important so discarded it.

Ming

On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 18:00 +0100, Damian Pietras wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:48:53AM -0500, Ming Zhang wrote:
> > it looks like the patch i have before. so it will not be accepted.
> > 
> > please check email archive and find out why my patch is not merged yet.
> > the reason is parameter parsing, but i do not know exactly why (if i
> > know, i will fix it and get it merged long time ago).
> 
> I can't find it. I've seen something about Read Only per session not per
> LUN, but it's not that?
> 

----- End forwarded message -----


-- 
Damian Pietras


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>