On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 17:09 -0800, R Morris (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> Arne Redlich wrote:
>
> >I guess we should rather put them somewhere on the website / wiki as
> the
> >list archives' formatting of the patches is less than helpful, and
> >nabble removed them altogether.
>
> Nabble didn't really removed them, we just didn't process the
> attachments. It's
> a tough call. If we accept attachments, then we have to do virus
> scanning and
> be sure that we're not proliferating natsy stuff.
>
> If the patches were added to the message, that would be fine. Of
> course, that
> does work for an exe, catch 22. Those probably should be uploaded to
> SourceForge
> or your web site or whatever with a link provided to the location.
ok. thx. i will put on website or upload to sf.net
>
> Regards,
> Rod Morris
> Nabble.com
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> View this message in context: Re: back-compatible patch for .4.13 with
> old kernel
> Sent from the iscsitarget-devel forum at Nabble.com.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
|
