Am Mittwoch, den 11.01.2006, 14:49 -0800 schrieb K Chapman:
> > so this is aix ini fault i think, it claims it can
> > support MaxRxDSL
> > (this is its capability) while assume target accept
> > this param means
> > target also has this capability. :P
> >
> > is it possible for you to file a bug ticket to aix?
> >
> > i know this is not follow the RFC, but can u try to
> > specify that
> > parameter to 256K in your conf file, without that
> > patch, and see if ok?
> >
> > i think the patch has no harm to IET code, but might
> > lead to OOM in low
> > HW configuration box.
>
> ive tried at 256k and it works still. ibm actually
> called me on my ticket and they are going to talk to
> the iscsi developers!!! wow... if anyone has any
> other suggestions for ibm, let me know as ill try to
> get them to listen to make the config for aix a bit
> more flexiable/compliant.
Yes, you should mention the CmdSN issue if you don't have it on your
list already. While this shouldn't be a problem with AIX vs. IET anymore
due to the workaround, it could lead to problems with targets actually
using a dynamic CmdSN window.
Arne
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
|
