On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 11:07 +0200, Arne Redlich wrote:
> Below's a patch to fix IET's inability of handling separate MaxRxDSLs
> for initiator and target.
>
> I didn't touch the kernel module's sanity check of the MaxRxDSLs,
> although I feel it's currently too restrictive. If a too large value (>
> 256k) is configured/announced for the target's/initiator's MaxRxDSL, the
> minimum value (512) is chosen, which is IMHO a rather hard punishment.
> I'd prefer the target to use the maximum supported value in this case.
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Arne
Why not just go back to the default value on request errors like this
instead of picking an arbitrary number?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|
