|
| <prev next> |
Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inference: msg#00006inquiry
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o PROI. Note 4 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Response to message by Frithjof Dau on the CG List: Frithjof & All, I will have to save the bits about P=?=NP for when I have the leisure to arrange my ducks more serially, but let me skip to the question about normal forms and try to tackle it the easiest possible way, by way of concrete examples. I have come to view a proof as an example of a semiotic process, a sequence of transformations "relieved against the background" of a triadic sign relation that comes with the formal system in view. But there are many different types of proof, and clearly not all semioses are proofs. For instance, I notice that John Sowa often gives us examples of proofs that start out with the sign that we call a blank SA, read as "true" under the existential interpretation, and then transforms it under the permissions of Peirce's rules to the sign that we want to prove is a theorem. I forget whether he likes equational (2-way) or implicational (1-way) transformations the best, but I found myself being led early on to maintain reversible transformations for as long as it was possible to do so during the progress of a proof, as these preserve all of the information that is borne by the orginal sign. Incidentally, somewhere in Peirce's manuscripts, that I was long ago reading a microfilm copy of for my undergrad work, he comments on this very difference between equational and modus ponens styles of semioses and he says something to the effect that if he had to start from scratch all over again that he would probably emphasize the equational, information-preserving type of process more than he had done. (I'd greatly appreciate it if anybody knows this passage -- I think he uses an example of a boy with a milk-pail (?)). Well, I'm rambling, but I have to break here anyway ... Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ ¢iare: http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey getwiki: http://www.getwiki.net/-User_talk:Jon_Awbrey zhongwen wp: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey http://www.altheim.com/ceryle/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JonAwbrey wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inference: 00006, Jon Awbrey |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inferencei: 00006, Jon Awbrey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |