|
Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inference: msg#00005inquiry
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o PROI. Note 3 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Responding to messages by John Sowa and Frithjof Dau on the CG List: It ''has'' been a while since I was read up on P=?=NP, but I think it's still important to emphasize that the model-theoretic question of propositional satisfiability (PSAT), whether a proposition has any satisfying interpretation (truth-value assignment that makes it true) is not the same as the proof-theoretic question of proof complexity. Of course, there's an obvious logical relation, but the translation of that relation into the corresponding computational complexities always seemed a bit tricky just as I remember it. In my own work on Alpha Graphs I found myself forced, all against my initial inclinations, to move from the proof-theoreric vein to more model-theoretic modes of approach. For the sake of propositional calculus, I am using "model-theoretic" in the rather weak sense of truth tables and boolean expansions. If one is interested in using Alpha Graphs as a practical data-modeling language, then one is forced to work with contingent propositions and equational (reversible) rules of inference, in effect, to ask for succinct normal forms that preserve ''all'' of the models (satisfying interpretations) of given propositions. It turns out that Peirce's system of alpha graphs, and even more so its extension to cactus graphs, is especially good at supplying succinct normal forms for propositional calculus formulas. Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ ¢iare: http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey getwiki: http://www.getwiki.net/-User_talk:Jon_Awbrey zhongwen wp: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey http://www.altheim.com/ceryle/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JonAwbrey wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inference: 00005, Jon Awbrey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inference: 00005, Jon Awbrey |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inferencei: 00005, Jon Awbrey |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Peirce's Rules Of Inference: 00005, Jon Awbrey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |