Fwd: Protocol Action: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard

This list wasn't CC'd, but I thought you all might want to know.

>To: IETF-Announce: ;
>Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@xxxxxxx>, IANA <iana@xxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@xxxxxxx>
>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Protocol Action: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard
>Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:38:26 -0500
>
>
>
>The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'XML Media Types'
><draft-murata-xml-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard.  This has been
>reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group.
>The IESG contact persons are Patrik Faltstrom and Ned Freed.
>
>
>Technical Summary
> 
>This document is an update of RFC 2376. It standardizes five media
>types -- text/xml, application/xml, text/xml-external-parsed-entity,
>application/xml-external-parsed-entity, and application/xml-dtd --
>for use in exchanging network entities that are related to the
>Extensible Markup Language (XML). This document also standardizes a
>convention (using the suffix '+xml') for naming media types outside
>of these five types when those media types represent XML entities.
>
>Major differences from RFC 2376 are (1) the addition of
>text/xml-external-parsed-entity,
>application/xml-external-parsed-entity, and application/xml-dtd, (2)
>the '+xml' suffix convention (which also updates the RFC 2048
>registration process), and (3) the discussion of "utf-16le" and
>"utf-16be".
>
>Working Group Summary
>
>Discussions about this memo has occurred on a number of mailing
>lists, including ietf-xml-mime@xxxxxxx and ietf-types@xxxxxxxxxxx
>There appears to be consensus for this update of RFC 2376.
>
>Protocol Quality
>
>Ned Freed has reviewed the specification for the IESG.
> 
Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books