|
Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: msg#00057ietf.xml-mime
Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > If that is the case then why didn't the MUA's adopt this? Why, for the same reason that DECnet implementations used to set the Ethernet address to match the DECnet network/node number, instead of using ARP like IP does... And the same reason that Dr. Johnson's dictionary defined "pastern" as "the knee of a horse"... Ignorance, sheer ignorance. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00057, Gavin Thomas Nicol |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00057, John Cowan |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xmli: 00057, Gavin Thomas Nicol |
| Next by Thread: | Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00057, Martin J. Duerst |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |