Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml

Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:

> Bottom line: text/xml, application/foo+xml and (to a lesser degree)
> application/xml are all useful. We should provide them all and give
> people clear guidelines on their use so that we can avoid the abuse
> we see with text/html.

In effect, application/xml is a proxy for x-whatever1/whatever2+xml,
which by the rules for "x-" (don't interpret it unless you know
what you are doing) can't be treated as XML by ignorant processors.


-- 
There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein