|
RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: msg#00047ietf.xml-mime
> I completely agree with Keith. Text/html was a mistake. That's like saying richtext was a mistake. The fact is that the MUA's are blindingly violating the HTML specification and making it an application-specific format. You can hardly blame text/html for that. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00047, Dan Kohn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00047, Gavin Thomas Nicol |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xmli: 00047, Mark Baker |
| Next by Thread: | RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00047, ned . freed |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |