|
|
|
RE: XHTML vs HTML media types: msg#00022ietf.xml-mime
RFC 2854 describes the applicability of 'text/html'; I would like to ask that any document that talks about the any other MIME type that might be used at least refer to it. I actually think that the double 'x' in 'xhtml+xml' is redundant, and that 'application/html+xml' might be more appropriate. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00022, Dan Kohn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml: 00022, Keith Moore |
| Previous by Thread: | XHTML vs HTML media typesi: 00022, Mark Baker |
| Next by Thread: | RE: XHTML vs HTML media types: 00022, ned . freed |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
|
|
| News | FAQ | advertise |