Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml

At 02:53 PM 10/18/00 -0400, Mark Baker wrote:
>Something we did consider, that we didn't really come to concensus on
>(AFAIK) at this morning's call was the possibility of registering both
>application/xhtml+xml and text/xhtml+xml, and letting server admins
>decide which one wins (or if both are useful).  Any thoughts about that?

I'd prefer to see JUST 'application/xhtml+xml', but could settle for having
both.

Transitions are never easy, it seems.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books