In the IETF-XML-MIME ML, Larry Masinter made proposed to slightly
revise the latest draft (draft-murata-xml-07.txt). Dave Peterson
agreed.
> For backward compatibility, application/xml and text/xml MAY,
> but SHOULD NOT, also be used for "external parsed entities",
> "external DTD subsets", and "external parameter entities".
>
> I don't think "MAY but SHOULD NOT" is a valid state in RFC 2119
> terminology, or called for. How about:
>
> application/xml and text/xml MUST NOT be used for "external parsed
> entities", "external DTD subsets", and "external parameter entities".
> Note that RFC 2376 (obsoleted) allowed this usage, although
> in practice it is likely to be rare.
I spoke with my co-authors: Dan Kohn and Simon St. Laurent. We
have agreed to accept the proposed change.
Sincerely yours,
IBM Tokyo Research Lab &
International University of Japan, Research Institute
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
|