ietf.xml-mime (date)

ietf.xml-mime (date)

September 30, 2000

Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, muraw3c
Re:, Chris Lilley
Re:, Simon St.Laurent

September 29, 2000

Re:, Chris Lilley
Re:, Simon St.Laurent
Re:, Chris Lilley

September 27, 2000

(unknown), Lloyd Rutledge
Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker
Re: XPointer scheme names (was Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?), Martin J. Duerst

September 26, 2000

Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Tim Bray
XPointer scheme names (was Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?), Eve L. Maler
Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Simon St.Laurent
Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Chris Lilley
Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Simon St.Laurent
Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker
Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Martin J. Duerst

September 25, 2000

Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Chris Lilley

September 21, 2000

Re: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker
RE: Conformance value of "+xml"?, Dan Kohn

September 20, 2000

Conformance value of "+xml"?, Mark Baker

September 14, 2000

RE: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, Dan Kohn
RE: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, Glen Zorn
Re: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, pcalhoun@xxxxxxxxxxx
draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt, Dan Kohn

September 13, 2000

RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, muraw3c

September 08, 2000

RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, Dan Kohn
RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, muraw3c

September 07, 2000

RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, ned . freed
RE: Fwd: Last Call: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard, muraw3c

September 05, 2000

your imaging supplies, bench1

News | FAQ | advertise