|
|
September 28, 1998
- Re: A question and comment about PKIX - Part 1, Version 11., Paul Hoffman / IMC
- A question and comment about PKIX - Part 1, Version 11., Allen_Rochkind
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Alan Lloyd
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Ed Gerck
- Time Stamp and Notary Drafts, Robert Zuccherato
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Peter Gutmann
- Re: Questions about PKIX, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: comments on draft-ietf-pkix-ipki2opp-08.txt, Sharon Boeyen
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, 吉武 淳
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldapv2-schema-02.txt, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Stefan Santesson
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Alan Lloyd
- Questions about PKIX, Stefan_Salzmann/HAM/Lotus
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, tyone
September 24, 1998
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Miklos, Sue A.
- Re: meeting minutes, Michael McNeil
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Mark Shuttleworth
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldapv2-schema-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-dcs-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part1-11.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: Amending the PKIX-WG Charter to reflect the addition of timestamping, Russ Housley
- RE: X.509 Documentation, Sharon Boeyen
- NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, Stefan Santesson
- Re: basic constraint extension, Peter Gutmann
- Re: X.509 Documentation, Denis Pinkas
- Re: meeting minutes, Denis Pinkas
- X.509 Documentation, CryptoNEWS
- Re: meeting minutes, Michael McNeil
September 18, 1998
- RE: proposed text for attributes, Tony Bartoletti
- RE: proposed text for attributes, Flanigan, Bill
- Who uses what?, Jan Willemson
- Re: Testing the ASN.1 in Part 1, Russ Housley
- Re: proposed text for attributes, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: fast review of draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt, Peter Sylvester
- Re: fast review of draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt, Denis Pinkas
- proposed text for attributes, Sharon Boeyen
- Re: fast review of draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt, Andreas Berger
- Re: fast review of draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt, Peter Sylvester
- Re: fast review of draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt, Peter Sylvester
- Re: fast review of draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt, Dan Weinstein
- Re: Testing the ASN.1 in Part 1, Dean Povey
September 10, 1998
- RE: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Fillingham, David W.
- RE: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Re: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Mike Smith
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-req-00.txt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Eric Murray
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Paul Koning
- PKIX transports using HTTP, Shailesh
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Denis Pinkas
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Denis Pinkas
- PKIX Certificate Management Protocols, Abhay Kulkarni
- For Option 2, William Dziadyk
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Narayan Raghu
September 09, 1998
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Tony Bartoletti
- For Option 2, Corcoran, Dan
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Fillingham, David W.
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Santosh Chokhani
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Eric Murray
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Tony Bartoletti
- For Option 2, randy . sanovic
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Kurn, David
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Kurn, David
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 2, David Boyce
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- For Option 2, Alan_Buffett
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Kurn, David
- New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication, Mike Smith
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 2, Ross_Smith
- Re: forward & reverse elements - population, Denis Pinkas
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Sharon Boeyen
- For Option none, Denis Pinkas
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: OFF TOPIC ???? RE: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: pathdevelopment complexity s), Alan Lloyd
- Re: OCSP in Chicago, Ambarish Malpani
- Re: depth, Rodney Thayer
- Re: OCSP in Chicago, Ed Posnak
September 08, 1998
- For Option 1, Russ Housley
- OCSP in Chicago, Ambarish Malpani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Sharon Boeyen
- FOR Option 2, Fuerst, Neal
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, PACHL, Jan
- For Option 2, Daya Puls
- For Option 2, rpierce
- For Option 2, Dimitri . Vekris
- For option 2, David Giglio
- OFF TOPIC ???? RE: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: pathdevelopment complexity s), Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- For Option 2, Dimitri . Vekris
- Re: forward & reverse elements - population, David Boyce
- Re: forward & reverse elements - population, David Boyce
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part1-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
- For Option 2, Jean_Bernatchez
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 2, jplachance
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population, PACHL, Jan
- For Option 2, tjcasar
- For option 2, DeRosenroll . Michael
- for Option 2, John A. DiDuro
- For Option 2, Jeremy Bingham
- FOR OPTION 2, Ton van Lieshout
- For Option 2, Svein Løseth
- forward & reverse elements - population, Sharon Boeyen
September 07, 1998
- RE: PKIX freeware library coming soon (fwd), Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: path development complexity s), Lynn . Wheeler
- depth, Pavel Krylov
- Re: Re relational - and Dirs and all that, Mike Smith
- Re relational - and Dirs and all that, Alan Lloyd
- Re: RE: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: pathdevelopment complexity s), Mike Smith
- RE: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: pathdevelo pment complexity s), Alan Lloyd
- Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: path development complexity s), Mike Smith
- Re: Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits, Stefan Santesson
- RE: path development complexity (was Re: What the straw poll mean s), Alan Lloyd
- RE: Defining Non-Repudiation, Stefan Santesson
- For Option 2, Jorgen Moller
September 04, 1998
- For option 2, Surendra Reddy
- RE: Heads Up - Historic digital signing ceremony, PACHL, Jan
- For Option 2, Salmond, Kent
- For Option 2, Smith, David
- For Option 2, John Hughes
- RE: Heads Up - Historic digital signing ceremony, Bill Brice
- For Option 2, JF Sauriol
- For Option 2, Larry Shomo
- RE: Heads Up - Historic digital signing ceremony, WHenry
- Re: Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits, Aram Perez
- RE: Heads Up - Historic digital signing ceremony, Kurn, David
- RE: What the straw poll means, Peter Sylvester
- For Option 2, Erin Connor
- Heads Up - Historic digital signing ceremony, Bill Brice
- Re: path development complexity (was Re: What the straw poll means), Robert Klerer
- For Option 2, Power, Michael: LEG
- For Option 2, Pamela Grannum
- For Option 2, Edmond . vanHees
- For Option 2, Steve O'Neil
- option 2, Mark Scherling
- RE: What the straw poll means, Sharon Boeyen
- For Option 2, Rene Eberhard
- RE: What the straw poll means, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means), Ryan Moats
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means, Bill Burr
- RE: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means), Miklos, Sue A.
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- Re: What the straw poll means, David Boyce
- RE: What the straw poll means, Stefan Santesson
- Re: Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits, Stefan Santesson
- (unknown), John_Wray
- TemporalData (Time Stamp Protocol), Denis Pinkas
- Re: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means), Denis Pinkas
- Re: What the straw poll means, Denis Pinkas
- for option 1, Andrea Sansone
- RE: path development complexity (was Re: What the straw poll mean s), Alan Lloyd
- For Option 2, Tony Bates
- path development complexity (was Re: What the straw poll means), Frank O'Dwyer
- RE: Where to store CA certificates, Alan Lloyd
- RE: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the s traw poll means), Alan Lloyd
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: Where to store CA certificates, Santosh Chokhani
September 03, 1998
- RE: What the straw poll means, Sharon Boeyen
- For Option 2, Eaton, James (EATO)
- RE: What the straw poll means, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the s traw poll means), Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means, John Everson
- Option 2, GIUBILEO/unix////////RFC-822/GIUBILEO#a#SPRINTSEC#f#COM
- Voting Question, John Everson
- RE: What the straw poll means, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- RE: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the s traw poll means), Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 2., Tuttle, Kimberly (OSSC)
- For Option 2, Evans, Jim (OSSC)
- RE: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the s traw poll means), Carlisle Adams
- For Option 1, Les Mitchell
- Re: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means), Ryan Moats
- For Option 2, Bill Burr
- For Option 2, Susan Lang
- For Option 2, David Solo
- Re: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means), Ambarish Malpani
- For Option 2, Robert Sabourin
- Option 2, GMurphy
- Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means), Carlisle Adams
- Re: What the straw poll means, Dave Horvath
- For Option 2, Rainer Rueppel
- RE: Where to store CA certificates, Sharon Boeyen
- Where to store CA certificates, Ambarish Malpani
- Re: What the straw poll means, Russel F. Weiser
- Re: What the straw poll means, Bill Burr
- Re: What the straw poll means, Bob Jueneman
- For Option #2, WHenry
- For option 1, Boby Joseph
- Re: What the straw poll means, Stephen Kent
- Retrieval efficiency herring? (was... RE: What the straw poll means), Ryan Moats
- For Option 2, Mary_Ellen_Zurko
- Re: What the straw poll means, Dave Horvath
- For Option 2, Peter Lindstrom
- Re: What the straw poll means, Dave Horvath
- Re: What the straw poll means, Bill Burr
- Option 1, Susan Joseph
- For Option 1, Chris Francis
- Re: What the straw poll means, Dave Horvath
- RE: What the straw poll means, John_Wray
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Dave Horvath
- For Option 1, Richard Pimental
- RE: What the straw poll means, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PK IX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means, Nada Kapidzic Cicovic
- RE: What the straw poll means, Bob Jueneman
- RE: What the straw poll means, Santosh Chokhani
- Re: Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits, Bob Jueneman
- What the straw poll means, Bob Jueneman
September 02, 1998
- For Option 1, bgmiller
- For Option 1, Carl Wallace
- For Option 1, Maloney, Teresa A.
- For Option 2, John Everson
- For Option 2, PACHL, Jan
- for Option 1, Charles Moore
- For Option 2, MA Crane
- For Option 1, Rick Johnson
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Sean Mullan
- For Option 1, Kenneth Eggers
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PK IX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Sharon Boeyen
- For Option 2, Eric Rosenquist
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PK IX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 1, Peter Brundrett
- For Option 2, Peter Yeatrakas
- For Option 1, Karen Oostendorp
- For Option 1, Peter Hesse
- For Option 2, Joe Tardo
- For Option 2, Bruce Greenblatt
- For Option 1, SLucch3390
- For Option 2, Dale Gustafson
- For Option 1, susanmaloney
- Extension of straw poll, Sharon Boeyen
- For Option 2, Ivan Milman
- For Option 1, Tom Horvath
- For Option 1, David Dalkowski
- For Option 1, Hirsch Matthew
- For Option 1, Bill Lenz
- For Option 2, Pawluk, Jean
- for option 1, Bruce Bell
- Option 1, Nora Kraemer
- For Option 2, Serge Mister
- For Option 1, David Berstein
- For Option 1, Chris Vance
- For Option 2, Sharon Boeyen
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PK IX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Sharon Boeyen
- For Option 1, Ella P. Gardner
- For Option 2, Saylor, John
- For Option 1, John Garner
- for option 1, Elliott N Ginsburg
- For Option 2, Mark C Davis
- Re: Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits, Stefan Santesson
- For Option 2, John_Wray
- For option 2, Jesse Walker
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes - PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Stefan Santesson
- For Option 2, Stefan Santesson
- For Option 2, Martin Lindström
- For Option 2, Thomas Caldenius
- Option 2, Andrey Lopatenko
- For Option 2, Nada Kapidzic Cicovic
- For Option 1, Pavel Krylov
- option 2, DGrawrock
- For Option 1, Yuriy Dzambasow
September 01, 1998
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Bob Jueneman
- For Option 2, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- For Option 1, Trevor Freeman
- For Option 1, Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 2, Mike Just
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes - PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 1, Michael Myers
- For Option 1, Sean Mullan
- For Option 2, Eduardo Rosemberg de Moura
- For Option 1, Brian LaMacchia
- For Option 1, Adkins, Sherrill
- for Option 1, Barb Fox
- for option 2, Greg Byrd
- For Option 1, Russel F. Weiser
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes - PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Stefan Santesson
- For Option 1, Fabio Omenigrandi
- For Option 2, Ron Chittaro
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes - PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Carlisle Adams
- For Option 2, Carlisle Adams
- For Option 1, Dave Horvath
- for option 2, MHenry
- For Option 1, Fillingham, David W.
- For Option 2, Stephen Farrell
- For Option 1, Michael Maloney
- For Option 2, Robert Zuccherato
- For Option 1, Rogers III, Edward B.
- For Option 1, Steven (Pete) Peterson
- For Option 1, Thomas Llanso
- For Option 1, Sean Turner
- For Option 1, Larry Layten
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes- PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Bob Jueneman
- For Option 1, John Pawling
- Re: Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits, Bob Jueneman
- For Option 2, Tim Polk
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes - PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Tim Polk
- For Option 1, Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems
- Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes - PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D, Sharon Boeyen
- fwd: Re: ...no subject..., Fred Gloade Hrdc-drhc
- Re: Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits, Aram Perez
|
|
