|
Re: PKIX draft for Non-Repudiation certificates: msg#00342ietf.x509
All, After reading my own mail concerning the PKIX draft on non-repudiation certificates I realize that I wasn't very clear on the fact that this is NOT yet an adopted work item for PKIX. At this moment this work is only a candidate work item that stand a reasonably good chance of getting adopted before the end of this year. The acceptance of this wok item is dependent on the response and progress on the list. It is also dependent on how pkix manages to get some of its current drafts into RFC:s. (especially part 1) The subject is though allowed to be discussed on the list since it is consistent with the PKIX charter. So I hope that you who want to see this as a PKIX work item show your interest by being active in the process. The decision in the end is up to our work group chairs (Steve and Warwick) and the Security area directors. /Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------- Stefan Santesson <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxx> Accurata Systemsäkerhet AB Lotsgatan 27 D Tel. +46-40 152211 216 42 Malmö Fax. +46-40 150790 Sweden Mobile +46-70 5247799 PGP fingerprint: 89BC 6C79 5B3D 591B 8547 1512 7D11 DBF4 528F 29A0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | PKIX draft for Non-Repudiation certificates: 00342, Stefan Santesson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, andephemeralvs.permanent key usage: 00342, Stefan Santesson |
| Previous by Thread: | PKIX draft for Non-Repudiation certificatesi: 00342, Stefan Santesson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, andephemeralvs.permanent key usage: 00342, Stefan Santesson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |