|
RE: directory enabled certificate status draft: msg#00332ietf.x509
Dear all - a few have asked for a copy - its only 12 pages or so - so heritis. Due to workload and lack of familiarisation with the formalities of posting drafts re titles, authors , etc - I await guidance. Also I posted this to the draft list on the 24th aug Aus time which is 23rd US time and I am not sure if the IETF drafts look at date submitted or date received as they said anything on the 24th or later will be processed. This sounds like a certificate issue waiting to happen eh! Note the doc does not cover privs or clearances or cert usage yet - but it will be easy to add this stuff. regards alan
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http-04.txt: 00332, Warwick Ford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage: 00332, Petra Glöckner |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: directory enabled certificate status drafti: 00332, Phillip M Hallam-Baker |
| Next by Thread: | I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http-04.txt: 00332, Warwick Ford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |