logo       

Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs. permanent key u: msg#00272

ietf.x509

Subject: Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs. permanent key usage

Eric,

Eric Murray wrote:
<snip>
> There'a already a huge plethora of extensions, a few more key
> usage bits that are unambiguous wouldn't hurt anything.

I disagree. This would hurt a number of implementor's who are
implementing the draft standard. X.509 should remain as stable as
possible.

Dave S.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise