|
CMP issue and question: msg#00199ietf.x509
In draft-ietf-pkix-ipki3cmp-08.txt the "Direct TCP Management Protocol" defines polling times to be an absolute time. I think it would be better to make it a relative time. Less time skew issues etc. Also, if the CA issues a certificate that has a value specified (start time, or some random extension) that the end entity did not specify would that be considered Granted or GrantedWithMods. I can argue either way. Mike |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | ETS Project on time-stamping: 00199, Jose A. Manas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: x.509 v3 Certificates and Compatbility: 00199, Dan Geer |
| Previous by Thread: | ETS Project on time-stampingi: 00199, Jose A. Manas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CMP issue and question: 00199, John_Wray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |