|
|
April 30, 1998
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces License Terms for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Michael Myers
- Entrust Technologies Announces License Terms for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Stephen Samson
- Re: OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, David P. Kemp
- Re: OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Denis Pinkas
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
April 29, 1998
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Ambarish Malpani
- Re: OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Ambarish Malpani
- RE: OCSP status tally, John Everson
- RE: OCSP status tally, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP status tally, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP status tally, Michael Myers
- RE: OCSP status tally, John Everson
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part4-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: OCSP status tally, Denis Pinkas
- Re: OCSP status tally, Rich Salz
- Re: OCSP status tally, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP status tally, Slava Galperin
April 28, 1998
- Re: OCSP status tally, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP at IETF, Ambarish Malpani
- [Fwd: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate], Ambarish Malpani
- Re: OCSP status tally, David P. Kemp
- Re: OCSP status tally, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP status tally, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
- OCSP status tally, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
- OCSP, Mullar Tim
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Todd Glassey
- RE: Padding Requirements for RSA signatures, Linn, John
- Proposed change to OpenCDP proposal., Marc Branchaud
- ocsp implementation, Yang Su Mi
April 24, 1998
- Re: Padding Requirements for RSA signatures, Number Twenty-Three
- Re: CDP Alternative Proposal, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL D istribution Points Patent, Pat Richard
- RE: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL D istribution Points Patent, Sharon Boeyen
- Re: CDP Alternative Proposal, Pat Richard
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Pat Richard
- Re: Padding Requirements for RSA signatures, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Re: Comment on PKIX-1 - cRLSign, David P. Kemp
- Re: Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Paul Koning
- Re: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, David P. Kemp
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Padding Requirements for RSA signatures, Andreas Berger
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Stephen P. Wilson
- Re: Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Peter Gutmann
- FW: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Blake Ramsdell
April 23, 1998
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Todd Glassey
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- FW: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Stephen Samson
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Warwick Ford
- Comment on PKIX-1 - cRLSign, Simonetti David
- Re: Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distribution Points Patent, Tim Polk
- Entrust Technologies Announces Royalty-free License for CRL Distr ibution Points Patent, Stephen Samson
- Entrust® Technologies Offers Free License of Patented Technology, Simonetti David
- Re: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, John_Wray
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Denis Pinkas
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, John_Wray
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Denis Pinkas
- Re: OCSP Response Values and Structure, Denis Pinkas
- Re: Key identifiers, Denis Pinkas
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ocdp-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
April 22, 1998
- Re: CDP Alternative Proposal, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
- Re: CDP Alternative Proposal, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
- RE: CDP Alternative Proposal, Flanigan, Bill
- RE: CDP Alternative Proposal, WHenry
- Re: CDP Alternative Proposal, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
- RE: CDP Alternative Proposal, Flanigan, Bill
- Re: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Moshe Litvin
- CDP Alternative Proposal, Warwick Ford
April 21, 1998
- Re: RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, David P. Kemp
- Re: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Marc Branchaud
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-webcap-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, David P. Kemp
- Re: RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP Response Values and Structure, Michael Myers
- Re: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Mike Smith
- Re: RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Mike Smith
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Andreas Berger
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Andreas Berger
- RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, lars . gu . johansson
- Re: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Moshe Litvin
- Re: Key Identifiers, Moshe Litvin
- Web based Certificate Access Protocol - WebCAP, Surendra Reddy
- Re: OCSP Response Values and Structure, Marc Branchaud
- Re: RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Bob Jueneman
- RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Paul Hoffman / IMC
April 20, 1998
- RE: Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Michael Myers
- OCSP Response Values and Structure, Michael Myers
- Security section of draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- pkix subject \ issuer names and RFC2247, Trevor Freeman
- Re: Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
- Re: Key Identifiers, Tony Bartoletti
- Re: Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
- Certificate Paths, Ian Roberts
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-caching-00.txt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Key Identifiers, Ian Roberts
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Denis Pinkas
April 17, 1998
- New location for the mailing list, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Russ Housley
- Re: Key Identifiers, Rich Ankney
- Re: pkix subject \ issuer names and RFC2247, David P. Kemp
- PKIX - Operational Protocols through WebCAP, Surendra Reddy
- pkix subject \ issuer names and RFC2247, Trevor Freeman
- PKIX Operational protocols through WebCAP, S.Reddy Virtual Office
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, SGalperin
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Ambarish Malpani
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
- Re: Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Key Identifiers, Sean Turner
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Michael Myers
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: OCSP at IETF, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
- Re: Key Identifiers, David P. Kemp
- Re: Key Identifiers, Ian Roberts
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Tim Polk
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Andreas Berger
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Denis Pinkas
- Re: OCSP at IETF, Denis Pinkas
- Re: Key Identifiers, Denis Pinkas
- Re: OCSP at IETF, Jeff Weinstein
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Paul Hoffman / IMC
April 16, 1998
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Stephen Kent
- Re: Unencumbered PKIX Minutes (Was: RE: [IETF-PKIX] D raft LA Minutes), Flanigan, Bill
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Tim Dierks
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, John Hughes
- Re: OCSP at IETF, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Denis Pinkas
- Re: OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, David Boyce
- Re: Draft LA Minutes, Carlisle Adams
- Re: OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, John Wray
- INFOSEC'COM 98, Denis Pinkas
- Re: Draft LA Minutes, Denis Pinkas
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Alexei V. Vopilov
April 14, 1998
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
- Re: Draft LA Minutes, Peter Gutmann
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Slava Galperin
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Draft LA Minutes, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, David P. Kemp
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP Usage Scenarios, Slava Galperin
- Re: Key Identifiers, Paul Koning
- Re: OCSP Usage Scenarios, Ambarish Malpani
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Ambarish Malpani
- Re: LDAP v2 schema - object classes for users and CAs, Andreas Berger
- Re: Draft LA Minutes, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP Usage Scenarios, Marc Branchaud
- Re: Key Identifiers, Andreas Berger
- Re: OCSP at IETF, Michael Myers
- Re: Draft LA Minutes, Bob Jueneman
- Re: OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- OCSP: Extended Error States in Responses, Ambarish Malpani
- OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Ambarish Malpani
- OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Ambarish Malpani
- Types of OCSP Responders, Ambarish Malpani
- OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Ambarish Malpani
- OCSP Usage Scenarios, Ambarish Malpani
- OCSP at IETF, Ambarish Malpani
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Mike Smith
April 13, 1998
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Marc Branchaud
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Michael Myers
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Bob Jueneman
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, David P. Kemp
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Bob Jueneman
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Bob Jueneman
- Re: OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Marc Branchaud
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Bob Jueneman
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Perry E. Metzger
April 11, 1998
- Draft LA Minutes, Warwick Ford
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Todd Glassey
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Scott Bradner
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Christian Huitema
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Scott Bradner
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Scott Bradner
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, John Day
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, John Day
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Bill Burr
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Tony Rutkowski
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
April 10, 1998
- OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Flanigan, Bill
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
- Some observations - technical and notTechnical, Flanigan, Bill
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Perry E. Metzger
- Re: RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
- Re: Key Identifiers, Sean Turner
- Re: Key Identifiers, Peter Gutmann
- RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
April 09, 1998
- Re: Key Identifiers, Simonetti David
- Key Usage Role in Cert Path Validation, Simonetti David
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Anil R. Gangolli
- Re: Key Identifiers, Tim Polk
- Re: Key Identifiers, Kevin Kingdon
- Re: Key Identifiers, Tim Polk
- Re: Key Identifiers, John Pawling
- Key Identifiers, Tim Polk
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Subject/Issuer Name Population, Tim Polk
- Enforcing constraints, Mark Shuttleworth
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Tim Dierks
- Re: Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Michael Myers
- Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Russ Housley
- Re: LDAP v2 schema - object classes for users and CAs, Sharon Boeyen
- LDAP v2 schema - object classes for users and CAs, Sean Turner
April 08, 1998
- Subject/Issuer Name Population, John Pawling
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Tony Bartoletti
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Criticality of extensions, Tony Bartoletti
- Re: LDAP v2 schema, Sharon Boeyen
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Brian Korver
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Robert Jueneman
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Tim Polk
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, David P. Kemp
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Bob Jueneman
- Comments on CMP-07, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
- Comments on CMP-07, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: Criticality of extensions, Paul Koning
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, David P. Kemp
- Re: Criticality of extensions, David P. Kemp
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Paul Koning
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, David P. Kemp
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Tim Polk
- Re: LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
- Re: LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
- Re: LDAP v2 schema, Nada Kapidzic Cicovic
- Re: LDAP v2 schema, Sharon Boeyen
- Re: LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
April 07, 1998
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Rich Ankney
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Marc Branchaud
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part1-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: Criticality of extensions, Tony Bartoletti
- Re: Questions about PKCS, Mark Shuttleworth
- Re: PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Brian Korver
- PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Marc Branchaud
- Definition of short OIDs in Distinguished Names, Andreas Berger
- Re: Criticality of extensions, Paul Koning
- Re: LDAP v2 schema, Sharon Boeyen
- LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
- Re: Duct-taping X.509, Peter Gutmann
- Criticality of extensions, Graham Bland
|
|