Re: Comment on RTPSEC minutes about architecture

It was not my understanding that keying would begin in the SIP path and
continue in the media path.  I thought it would be done in the media  
path.

Did I miss something?

-prz

On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:49 AM, David R Oran wrote:

> On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Even, Roni wrote:
>
> > Dan,
> > In the architecture section of the executive summary you wrote
> >
> > ARCHITECTURE
> > The question of SIP-path versus media-path keying was discussed.
> > Consensus was for media-path keying (which includes hybrid modes). No
> > clear consensus for RTP-plane versus RTCP-plane.
> >
> > While in the detailed minutes is says.
> >
> > HUM: Media plane + SIP/SDP (Strong)
> >
> > To me your summary is not capturing the Hum since I thought that the
> > consensus was that starting with SIP/SDP and if needed to continue  
> > the
> > process in the media path is OK. Which means that every solution  
> > SIP/SDP
> > only, Media path only or start with SIP/SDP and continue with  
> > media path
> > is what people hummed on.
> That was my understanding of the Hum as well.
>
> > Thanks
> > Roni Even
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ietf-
> > > rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Wing
> > > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:33 PM
> > > To: ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RTPSEC minutes
> > >
> > >
> > > The RTPSEC minutes are now available at:
> > >
> > >   http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/minutes/rtpsec.txt
> > >
> > > Please send corrections to me prior to the corrections cutoff date,
> > August
> > > 28.
> > >
> > > -d

----------------------------------------------
Philip R Zimmermann        prz@xxxxxxx
http://philzimmermann.com  tel +1 650 322-7223
(spelled with 2 n's)       fax +1 650 322-7877